USGS/Cascades Volcano Observatory, Vancouver, Washington
REPORT:
Historical Unrest at Large Calderas of the World
-- Christopher G. Newhall and
Daniel Dzurisin, 1988,
Historical Unrest at Large Calderas of the World:
U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1855, 1108p., 2 volumes.
Principal Conclusions
- The most common processes causing seismic swarms, uplift, and other
elements of caldera unrest are regional tectonic strain, magmatic intrusion and
processes within magma reservoirs, and hydrologic processes, as listed in the
section on "Processes of Caldera Unrest".
- Unrest resembling that at calderas occurs in noncaldera and even
nonvolcanic settings, calling special attention to the role of regional tectonic
and hydrothermal processes as agents of unrest.
- Most unrest is a hybrid of several processes acting simultaneously or in
sequence, and in many instances interacting with each other. Because of
feedback mechanisms between processes, it is rarely possible or meaningful to
classify specific unrest as purely tectonic, magmatic, or hydrothermal.
- Calderas are dynamic and delicately balanced systems, and they can be
disturbed by even small stimuli. Most unrest at silicic calderas occurs in
response to routine, relatively minor tectonic strain or small-volume basaltic
underplating of silicic reservoirs.
- Different processes with different implications for hazards produce
similar symptoms of unrest. Even a well-understood hybrid of processes can lead
to many different outcomes.
- The most common types of unrest (for example, seismic swarms and
thermal, fumarolic, and hydrologic changes) are not reliable indicators of
impending eruptions. Changes that are more diagnostic of impending eruptions
are harmonic tremor; an exponentially escalating rate of seismic energy release
or a sudden, pronounced drop in seismic energy release; a sudden, pronounced
increase in the rate of uplift or sudden deflation after an extended period of
inflation; opening of, and intense fumarolic emissions from, new fissures; or a
sudden, sharp increase in hot-spring discharge.
- Although large calderas hold a greater potential for catastrophic
eruptions than small centers, most eruptions at calderas are relatively small.
- Caldera unrest is likely to persist for months to years, sometimes even
for decades to centuries, and to be intermittent rather than to show a
systematic increase until culmination.
- Much unrest does not culminate in an eruption, but eruptions are likely
enough that many persons will choose to take precautionary measures. The choice
of such measures is complicated by the long periods over which unrest can
persist and the wide range of scales of potential eruptions, from minor to
colossal eruptions that change the course of human history.
- The outcome of a specific episode of unrest cannot and should not be
forecast solely on the basis of patterns of unrest at other calderas, given the
uncertainties in generalizeing from one caldera to another or from this entire
compilation to a single restless caldera. Rather, we suggest that this
compilation can
- show what is ordinary and extraordinary
(qualitatively and in a few instances semiquantitatively),
- suggest multiple interpretations of unrest, and
- suggest new investigations to constrain interpretations of
unrest.
- The delicate equilibrium of calderas may cause them to become restless
if regional stress increases, as in advance of major regional earthquakes.
Calderas should be monitored for unrest that might forewarn of strong regional
earthquakes.
There is no simple solution to the interpretation and forecasting of complex
events at calderas. However, the rich record of historical caldera unrest is
important for basic research and crisis response alike. Processes that last
millennia and longer are recorded in the geological record, and day-to-day or
year-to-year processes are recorded by modern monitoring. Many of the processes
in large magma reservoirs and hydrothermal systems, as seen at large calderas,
operate over periods of months to millennia. The historical records in this
study are a bridge between classical geology and modern volcano-tectonic
monitoring. We recommend that fascinating walk across this bridge, before and
during future crises at calderas.
Return to:
[Report Menu] ...
URL for CVO HomePage is:
<http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/home.html>
URL for this page is:
<http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Glossary/Caldera/Publications/Bulletin1855/conclusions.html>
If you have questions or comments please contact:
<GS-CVO-WEB@usgs.gov>
01/22/98, Lyn Topinka